Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike

I recall that after Iran-Contra that a bunch of laws were passed to make this much more difficult, I wonder if Obama is violating any of these laws?


2 posted on 06/21/2013 11:56:42 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dila813

I wonder if Obama is violating any of these laws?

every time he wakes up in the WH


6 posted on 06/21/2013 11:59:15 AM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dila813

Which reminds me. Ed Markey voted against funding the Contras after kissing Ortega’s ass.


11 posted on 06/21/2013 12:07:04 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dila813

Laws mean nothing to Obastard.


35 posted on 06/21/2013 1:43:20 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dila813

No, the lesson of Iran-Contra was that the existing laws worked (were sufficient). No new laws were passed. The failure was people, not the laws.

The covert arms sales to Iran violated numerous statutes that restricted the transfer of arms to nations that support international terrorism, principally the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (Pub. L. No. 90-629, 89 Stat. 1320 [22 U.S.C.A. §§ 2751–2796c (1989 Supp.)]).

By failing to report the Iranian sales to Congress, the Reagan administration had ignored reporting provisions in the 1980 Intelligence Oversight Act (Pub. L. No. 96-450, tit. IV, 407(b) (1), 94 Stat. 1981 [50 U.S.C.A. § 413 (1982)]).

That law required the president to notify Congress in a timely fashion of any “significant anticipated intelligence activity, and to make a formal written “finding” (declaration) that each covert operation was important to national security.

It seems likely that the 0bama Administration “gets” the arms sales reporting statute, which is why 0bama has kept delaying sending heavy arms to the Syrian rebels today (though old M40 anti-tank cannons have made it to them), however, the law requiring the reporting of significant intelligence activity has probably been broken by 0bama’s Administration already.


38 posted on 06/21/2013 1:56:48 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dila813
I recall that after Iran-Contra that a bunch of laws were passed to make this much more difficult, I wonder if Obama is violating any of these laws?

I certainly won't have to wonder if he's violating any of those laws, because I know he is. Sometimes it's better to be a pessimist.

41 posted on 06/21/2013 2:04:41 PM PDT by wastedyears (I'm a gamer not because I choose to have no life, but because I choose to have many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dila813

>>I wonder if Obama is violating any of these laws?

That would only be relevant in a Republic that hadn’t gone Bananas.


56 posted on 06/22/2013 4:19:16 AM PDT by TArcher ("TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men" -- Does that still work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dila813

How is it secret training when the Chinese media broadcast footage of US troops training al Qaeda rebels a few years ago? Pretty sad when the slow-moving Chinese media outscoops the MSM on Middle East coverage.


63 posted on 06/22/2013 6:40:03 PM PDT by TexGrill (Don't mess with Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson