Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expat_panama
We've got a very serious threat of deflation --far worse than inflaion-- something brutally clear with the collapse of comodity prices.

The official numbers are a crock, of course, excluding food and energy as they do [not to mention equities]. The Shadowstats figures of around 7% or 8% are probably pretty good.

That isn't "run away hyperinflation" to be sure, but 7% or 8% price inflation is very damaging. Tell me, why do you defend pumping money into the country that no one had to work for or produce something tangible for?

Citizens and businesses must work to earn money [unless, of course, they're on welfare and someone else works in their place]. When the Fed prints more money and gives it to the banks to spend, it is expecting that these dollars created out of nothing compete for goods and services with the same money we had to get up in the morning and work for.

The money we had to mortgage our houses to start a new business with.

The money we had socked away for retirement or maybe a house.

The money we buy groceries with.

The new money now competes with ours and drives prices higher. How can you possibly defend that?

55 posted on 06/22/2013 3:51:52 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The Eurozone policy might best be described as "Laurel and Hardy Carry a Piano Upstairs.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: BfloGuy; Mase; Toddsterpatriot
official numbers are a crock, of course, excluding food and energy as they do

Somebody please do me a favor and post the BLS link explaining how the CPI-U includes food'n'energy. This is giving me a headache...

57 posted on 06/22/2013 5:17:47 PM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson