That was too vague to be useful, I could make out that you disagree with the libertarian position on fully open borders, but you didn’t reveal your disagreement with the libertarian position on the raging gay issues.
For instance “Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.”
Rather than say I agree with libertarians on it, it’s fairer to say that I don’t care enough to disagree. My primary issues are the surveillance state, Second Amendment violations, and inevitable financial collapse / police state response, all of which are the greatest threats to personal liberty. I don’t think it’s a requirement that you must have a firm opinion or care about every particular issue.
Gays are on my “Don’t care” list. I could not care less what gays do (unless an squad of gays armed with pink M4s come for my guns — then I care).
We have the luxury of living in a society that can dwell on silly questions like whether two men can or should be able to get married. My concern is that every society that has become so comfortable as to obsess over frivolous things soon after collapsed under the weight of its own distractions and excesses.
I prefer to prioritize.