The stench from their crimes/screw-ups stretches far and wide (naming names just to keep them front and center):
<><> there's the Benghazi stench
<><> Hillary's state dept's coverup of sex scandals---obstructing justice---scrubbing investigations
<><> Holder's DOJ stenches (AP--Rosen--PLUS holder suggesting he monitored USSC and Congress' Verizon blackberries)
<><> stench-a-rama: IRS targeting (enraging the legions of IRS haters)
<><> IRS stealing 60 thousand medical records
<><> HHS' Sibelius strong-arming Obamacare insurance providers for money
<><> NSA snooping---infuriating millions of young twitter/facebook users
<><> IRS sending $45 Million/that's 32,000 EITC refunds to illegals at ONE address.
<><> Letting Snowden globe-trot w/ US secrets (next stop Ecuador--gets $35M US tax dollars---Us has no diplo there; Ecuador threw out our rep b/c he reported it was grossly corrupt.
<><> EPA using phantom email accounts
<><> Fast and Furious Holder gun-running that armed savage drug cartels, and got two American border patrol agents killed.
=======================================================
Snowden's no hero-----but he's making Obama and Holden look like the idiots they are.....guy is globe-trotting, using US secrets as trading cards.....and O/Holder can't seem to do a dam thing about it.
=====================================================
WHY ECUADOR? Snowden seeks asylum in Ecuador. You can bet Ohaha wont queer that deal. Ecuadorians are Third World latinos---O needs them to stay in power another 10-20 years. Wiki leaker Julian Assange is staying at Ecuador's embassy in Britain.
BTW, the US has no diplos in Ecuador---they threw out the one we had b/c our diplo squealed on their corruption and heroin drug-running.....but Ecuador still gets some $35 million foreign aid from the US.
Same could be said of Paul Revere, Sam Adams, Thomas Jefferson, etc. by the British 237 years ago.
Either we have a 4th Amendment or we don't. If we have one, then what the government is doing is clearly unconstitutional, and falls under the heading of "illegal actions of a tyrannical police state." Or if we don't then it falls under the heading of "expected actions of a tyrannical police state."
I've listened to pompous sanctimonious government blowhards blathering about what Snowden did "hurting our security" all week. First I don't believe a word of their sh!t. Any terrorist with the intelligence of an 0bama voter would realize that emails and cell phone conversations are subject to interception. No what really burns their a$$es is that they got caught doing soething that is clearly illegal. SO they're blowing pink smoke up everyone's backside as fast as they can with the "national security" bull squeeze to distract from the fact that what they are doing is WRONG. The 4th Amendment doesn't say people shall be secure etc. EXCEPT WHEN THE GOVERNMENT DEEMS IT TO BE IN THE GOVERNMENT'S INTEREST FOR THEM NOT TO HAVE THESE RIGHTS. No. it says
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The government has been carving away at this ever since it was written, but this wholesale spying throw the thing out altogether.