Really depends on which millenials. Obamanomics is crafted to give handouts almost exclusively to minorities and women. Caucasian male millenials will not, over the long haul, benefit from Obama handouts. To a lesser extend, minority male millenials also will not benefit: As the government becomes increasingly cash-strapped, the Obamanauts will have to choose between male minorities and female minorities. They won’t pick males. Indeed, this has always been a tension, but it will become exacerbated over time if we stay on this course.
Obamanomics is crafted to give handouts almost exclusively to minority men and women - they're totally PO'd that white women (and their husbands) are able to get around their intent by putting the businesses in their wives' names.
The public polling data analysis I saw following the 2012 presidential election show that a majority of white young voters (Young defined as under 30) did in fact vote for Mitt Romney. Minority youth (black, hispanic, and Asian) voted so overwhelmingly BHO, that youth vote wound up once again decisively in the Obama camp. The older you are in America, the whiter you are, the more likely you are to vote GOP. Younger people are much less white and much less likely to vote GOP. With respect to the white vote, the percentage Romney received-—close to 60%-—several decades ago, would have been more than enough to guarantee him a Nixon or Reagan-like landslide. If you could factor out union members, Jewish and gay voters, from the white voting universe, whites do in fact vote almost as overwhelmingly Republican as blacks, hispanics, and Asians vote overwhelmingly Democrat. Race and frequency of religious observance seem to be the biggest factors determining party preference—not socio-economic factors. Why blacks and hispanics vote overwhelmingly Democrat seems perfectly understandable, why Asians do is still somewhat of a mystery.