Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideminded

I think it’s well established that TM attacked GZ.

The state will have to justify that attack by saying GZ started it.

The state will not deny that TM attacked GZ, unless they are foolish.


56 posted on 06/25/2013 12:50:57 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: ltc8k6
lol Well the state is screwed then, because you are allowed to defend yourself against an attack if you feel your life is threatened even if you supposedly “Started it.”
Also, in what world is violence a normal reaction to being asked “why you're in this neighborhood”, or for being followed?
You're not allowed to put your damn hands on anyone unless you are defending yourself against their attack.

If you initiate violence against someone they might kill your ass to make you stop. These are the risks you take in knocking someone down on the ground and pounding their head on cement.

72 posted on 06/25/2013 4:17:07 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson