Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

No. It’s pretty much only the CA AG or Governor that has standing.


101 posted on 06/26/2013 8:21:55 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: RIghtwardHo

The idea that a group can get an initiative on the ballot and not defend it in court is ludicrous.*

This is the same BS about OB, the hero of benghazi’s eligibility.

We are entitled to a legal and honest election, but we have no standing to claim one in court.


113 posted on 06/26/2013 8:27:54 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

The CA AG or Governor should not have veto power over the people’s vote, and that is basically what they did.


128 posted on 06/26/2013 8:44:39 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

Right, so look at the evil Jerry Brown did to the vote of his own people. One POS liberal pissed on his own citizens.


145 posted on 06/26/2013 8:57:37 AM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: RIghtwardHo

Exactly. And by the courts writing, how would anyone but them be “harmed” by same sex marriage? That lack of harm, and therefore standing before SCOTUS essentially guarantees that the Appeals Court decision will never be overturned.


170 posted on 06/26/2013 9:43:35 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue (I have no home. I'm the wind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson