Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge
Back in the day, that was the understanding, hence no need to federalize the institution since homosexual "marriage" was not even a threat to natural relations in the States. Federal expansion started occurring which then institutionalized the recognition. Then the 1960s happened and look what is happening.

Apparently the Libertarians think time travel is possible today so that people who try to protect marriage can go back and defeat the 16th, Medicare/Medicaid, Immigration laws, Social Security Act, etc. that officially institutionalized matrimony in the Fed government. Erase the sexual revolution and go back to the cultural mindset of the late 18th century.
204 posted on 06/26/2013 10:41:40 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi

Read Reynolds vs the United States. Your argument is incorrect. Marriage has been federal since there’s been a US. The definition of marriage as one man and one woman was never left up to the states and Reynolds argues this is why the federal government could ban polygamy.

Arguing that ‘it’s not federal’ has opened the door for gay marriage in all 50 states. Congratulations.


206 posted on 06/26/2013 10:52:59 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Un Pere, Une Mere, C'est elementaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson