Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP's Sensenbrenner calls for update of Voting Rights Act
The Hill ^ | June 26, 2013 | Mike Lillis

Posted on 06/26/2013 2:20:48 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: jazusamo

Oh yes, by all means, you have to stop those Confederate States from reimposing Jim Crow laws and revitalizing the KKK. 150 years of punishment is not near enough./s

I have come to the conclusion that if anything good is to come out of Versailles on the Potomac, it’ll be right after Hell freezes over and the Toronto Maple Leafs win the Stanley Cup.


21 posted on 06/26/2013 2:41:27 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I suspect that this is a divide that goes beyond Republican and Democrat. As someone mentioned in jest, “The Voting Rights Act was the sequel to Reconstruction.”

In other words, this may actually be an effort by the northern states to retain political and cultural dominance over the southern states.

As bizarre as that sounds on the surface, there is still a large cultural divide between the North and the South.

The only reason Reconstruction ended was that there was a disputed presidential election, and the South offered its support to a candidate in exchange for the withdrawal of the last Union soldiers stationed in its state capitals.

Were it not for this, Reconstruction might still be in effect, long after race was an issue, solely so that the northern states could “keep the South in its place.”

If that sounds ridiculous, then why did the northern dominated congress keep extending the Voting Rights Act mandates on the South “even though the situation had changed”? That is, continuing to extend the act was based on conditions in the early 1960s.

But the proof of this pudding is in the eating. Constitutionally, congress *can* recreate the Voting Rights Act, but for *ALL* the states, not just the southern states.

Dollars to donuts these northern congressmen would be very strongly opposed to *that* idea. “Not us! Only THEM!”


22 posted on 06/26/2013 2:43:49 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

no, he’s actually a good guy.’but he is terribly, terribly wrong on this.


23 posted on 06/26/2013 2:44:46 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Yes, Jim. There is still danger of discrimination at the polls. Democrats and their minions are allowed to vote as many times as they want, while Republicans and conservatives can vote only once.


24 posted on 06/26/2013 2:44:54 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Apparently Wisconsin has some election fraud problems so I’m sure sensenbrenner won’t mind having Wisconsin included in the legislation. Possibly he also wants to include Pennsylvania, Ohio, New Jersey and New York. Wait let’s not forget Minnesota.


25 posted on 06/26/2013 2:45:48 PM PDT by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
Why would anyone flame you for writing the truth...?
26 posted on 06/26/2013 2:59:31 PM PDT by oldoverholt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Merely a diversion to keep Republicans BUSY while something ELSE is going on..

like; AMNESTY for 20+ million new democrats..
each of which could conceivably vote several times for more Obama money..

27 posted on 06/26/2013 3:00:31 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas56

You’re right I’m so sick of this kind of crap, I’m seventy years old and first voted in a Republican primary in 1964, I have never missed an election or a primary and have never voted for a democrat, I’ve given money, put up signs, made phone calls, held meetings and knocked on doors and now I have absolutly been betrayed by the Republican party. I gathered signatures for Voter ID from one end of the State to the other, had it pass overwhelmingly only to be held up by the DOJ and now this AH wants to re-instate a law that will again devalue my vote before I ever even have the opportunity to cast a vote at full value or at least near full value. democrat votes count 1.05 Republican votes count .95, I’d like for mine to get to at least .98. Thank God for Senator Ted Cruz and Congressmen Louie Gohmert and Trey Gowdy.


28 posted on 06/26/2013 3:03:26 PM PDT by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Exactly right.


29 posted on 06/26/2013 3:04:01 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
Just yesterday there was an editorial in our local paper that used my township as an example of the racial discrimination that "might" be taking place. The "evidence" was the fact that we only had 3 black voters in the last election. (70% overall turnout and the township went for Romney)

Here is the census data

As of the census of 2000, there were 2,922 people, 1,135 households, and 831 families residing in the township. The population density was 97.4 per square mile. There were 1,568 housing units at an average density of 52.2 per square mile. The racial makeup of the township was 97.26% White, 0.62% African American, 0.51% Native American, 0.10% Asian, 0.14% from other races, and 1.37% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 0.68% of the population.
30 posted on 06/26/2013 3:09:08 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

According to the SC ruling there is no wiggle room on what Congress can do. Their ruling was very specific....that’s really why the libs are so POed.


31 posted on 06/26/2013 3:09:23 PM PDT by ak267 (THORIUM....ENERGY OF THE FUTURE!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775

I am through with Republicans...
*********
Me too. They want our votes and money but not our principles. I’m done with the Republican Party.


32 posted on 06/26/2013 3:10:32 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wisconsinlady

Sensenbrenner: Collecting phone records abuses Patriot Act(The Author)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3029605/posts

not to worry. he can just tweak a few words and everything will be wonderful again.
/sarc


33 posted on 06/26/2013 3:14:50 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; Wisconsinlady; JPG; ...

Sensenbrenner and the Voting Rights Act

FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.


34 posted on 06/26/2013 3:23:06 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

im going to throw up


35 posted on 06/26/2013 5:05:09 PM PDT by markneil1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.) is urging lawmakers from both parties to cast aside partisanship and restore the law for the sake of protecting voters' rights

No one cares about the rights of the voters in California though.
Seriously, he can go to hell.
36 posted on 06/26/2013 5:10:38 PM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Time to leave the stupid party to die in its own vomit.


37 posted on 06/26/2013 6:25:44 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson