Huelskamp: 'It's Not Over' - Constitutional Amendment Would Restore Gay Marriage Ban

http://www.newsmax.com/ ^ | Thursday, 27 Jun 2013 10:25 AM | Lisa Barron

[DannyTN]

A constitutional amendment restoring the Defense of Marriage Act, to be introduced by Rep. Tim Huelskamp, likely would reignite the debate over same-sex marriage. The Kansas Republican said he plans to introduce the Federal Marriage Amendment to restore DOMA, which was struck down by the Supreme Court this week.

[OneWingedShark]

The problem with a Constitutional Amendment, though, is that it will be as binding on the government as the 4th, 5th, and 6th were on the NSA/FISA-court.

[fwdude]

The problem with a Constitutional Amendment, though, is that it will be as binding on the government as the 4th, 5th, and 6th were on the NSA/FISA-court.

Then, it will be more fuel for the revolution.

[OneWingedShark]

>> The problem with a Constitutional Amendment, though, is that it will be as binding on the government as the 4th, 5th, and 6th were on the NSA/FISA-court.
>
> Then, it will be more fuel for the revolution.

I think we have enough fuel; what we need is a spark:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3030973/posts

[AuH2ORepublican]

“So what wording do we need to make “Man” and “Woman” meaningful again?”

---

Biological male (i.e., having a Y chromosome) and biological female (i.e., not having a Y chromosome). A person can snip off body parts, but can’t change his genes.