To: null and void
Unless this type of study can prove that ancient horses had five fingers and five toes, or were adept at basket weaving ... I see no point in the research other than curiosity.
If, after studying all of this, they admit that there is not much variation or difference in the two horses ... stop the funding and go find YETI
4 posted on
06/28/2013 8:32:36 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: knarf
“... I see no point in the research other than curiosity.”
Exactly. Much government-funded research is playground stuff. Scientists having fun with other people’s money, but realizing no tangible benefit to society.
To: knarf
Unless this type of study can prove that ancient horses had five fingers and five toes, Eohippus (meaning "dawn horse") was the earliest-known horse ... This primitive horse had 4 hoofed toes on the front feet and 3 hoofed toes on each hind foot.
I assume 4 in the front and 3 in the back doesn't meet your high standards.
6 posted on
06/28/2013 8:45:27 AM PDT by
null and void
(Republicans create the tools of oppression, and the democrats gleefully use them!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson