Jun 7, 2013, L.K. responds.
1. Admits.
2. Denies visits have gone well.
Not in best interest of child to live in California.
States N.E. is a registered sex offender.
States N.E. is living with son J.E.
3. Says N.E. agreed to visit with child in Ok for Christmas.
Says N.E. brought son with him.
Says both N.E. and son J.E. stayed with child in Hotel.
Claims son J.E. touched child’s genitals while in the presence of J.E.
Claims ongoing investigation by Ok Dept of Human Services
Claims safety plan advices L.K. not to allow child to travel to California. Not to allow visitation if J.E. is present.
4. L.K. denies interference with internet visitation. Claims N.E. stopped contacting L.K.
5. L.K. admits she is close to parents R.C. and J.C.
Denies any testimony at previous motion is before court.
L.K. has lived alone with child for one year.
mom J.C. filed for guardianship because she wanted child to attend school in her district.
Matter was dismissed.
6. L.K. should have sole custody.
Requests all visitation (if any) occur in Ok.
Requests son not be allowed any visitation.
son J.E. should not have contact with child.
7. L.K. recently approved S.S.Sup. Sec. Income of $710/mo
This income should not be used.
N.E. income should be used.
N.E. should pay per guidelines.
N.E. should pay all travel.
8. L.K. should be paid for her attorney fees.
N.E. (dad) requests order for Misty Baldwin, DHS Child Welfare Worker, to testify in case on June 24th.
Order granted.