Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
"I believe Lois Lerner waived her 5th Amendment privileges," Issa said. "She did so when she voluntarily chose to deliver an opening statement"

I very much disagree with that assessment: here's why. (2 videos.)

26 posted on 06/28/2013 1:38:46 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

I don’t=it should be but it isn’t


30 posted on 06/28/2013 1:53:52 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: OneWingedShark
Those are both good videos (your post 26), and everyone (and I mean everyone) should view them.

But I don't think apply to the Lerner case. I'm no lawyer, but in a formal (not street) situation, you cannot give testimony and then refuse to be cross-examined.

For example, a defendant at a trial does not have to take the stand.

But if the defendant does take the stand to proclaim his innocence, the prosecution has every right to cross-examine. The defendant has waived his 5th amendment rights in that case.

If I'm wrong, perhaps a FR lawyer will correct me.

33 posted on 06/28/2013 2:04:41 PM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson