[FredZarguna]

This non-debate is typical of the kind of crap we have to put up with when commentators refuse to cut to the chase: If handwriting is legible, ANY person of modest capacity who can read is able to read it (yes, as somebody else said, "it's just another font.")

The bottom line is that a dim-witted perjurer could NOT READ AT ALL. Look at her testimony on the previous day when she is handed typewritten exhibit after exhibit and clearly has NO idea what they say. "I can't read cursive" is baloney. She can't read, and the defense clearly knew this when they asked her to read the letter she'd supposedly written.

[Dilbert San Diego]

The fact that she supposedly wrote that letter, but can’t read it, is very damning testimony.

It’s funny that this article is focused on the subject of reading cursive, rather than the fact that this girl lied. She either had to be lying about writing the letter, or lying about not being able to read it.

[kearnyirish2]

“She can’t read, and the defense clearly knew this when they asked her to read the letter she’d supposedly written.”

You’re right. If you’ve ever met someone in those circumstances, it is really sad. Growing up around crackers, I always assumed everyone could read; only when I was older did I realize that one of them couldn’t.