It’s not just about race. It’s about gay-bashing. Trayvon suspected Zimmerman may have been stalking him for homosexual reasons. Thus the description as “creepy-ass cracker”, “pussy-ass cracker”, and “rapist”. He possibly used other, more specific anti-gay descriptions that Jeantel was coached not to reveal.
Trayvon Martin was likely a gay-basher who decided to put a beat-down, MMA-style, on someone he perceived to be gay.
What would the lefties think if little Trayvon turned out to be the antithesis of their innocent little boy?
“What would the lefties think if little Trayvon turned out to be the antithesis of their innocent little boy?”
They would do what they always do:
1. Ignore it
2. “Racist!”
3. Double-Speak that non-violent people are violent aggressors and violent people are non-violent victims
4. Interpretation really depends on context, culture, history
etc.
Do you remember the case of Tawana Brawley? It was the cases where Rev Al Sharpton made his bones in the ‘civil right movement.’
Even after it was all found to be an undeniable fraud, the race baiters justified it as “it could have been.” The Brawley case was then cast by the same race baiter as symbolic of the oppression of blacks at the hand of white cops, blah blah blah.
The NY prosecutor defamed by Sharpton/Brawley sued them and won several hundred thousand dollar judgments that as far as I know have never been paid. Sharpton, now a TV star and former candidate for the U.S. Senate (and presidencey?) has significantly increased his financial worth since the Brawley case. Brawley herself was finally served papers to garnish her salary to pay damages to that prosecutor for the judgement won so long ago.