Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

I’ve not heard of a corps of that small size, though I suppose outside of the Army of the Potomac they may well have existed.

But you’re quite right. In World War II The U.S. Army opted for the policy you describe for the South, through its replacement policy.

I just think that the idea of fighting a regiment as a skirmish line due to combat casualties is odd. But evidently that is how they did it.


16 posted on 07/02/2013 11:51:44 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Colonel_Flagg

Seems to me if you have all of these odd sized units around it would get confusing to command and make good decisions.....When you got brigades the size of regiments something is wrong....


19 posted on 07/02/2013 12:06:43 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Colonel_Flagg

The union fielded 8 corps of various sizes at Gettysburg. The South 3 traditional corps of roughly 30,000 each.


20 posted on 07/02/2013 12:17:07 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson