[MestaMachine]

I’m sorry, but this is one of the most ridiculous explanations I have ever seen. WHERE do homosexuals fight and die for their beliefs? Please....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2519664/posts

OBAMA, ISLAM, AND THE HARD LEFT
Self | May 23, 2010 | MestaMachine

Snip first few paragraphs:

I have asked so many people HOW in the world can a normal person accept this? And I have found that NORMAL people do NOT accept this at all.

WHO converts to islam?

Here is what I believe, and I am open to suggestions or even criticism if you think I am wrong.
I believe that people who WILLINGLY convert to islam, who were NOT born and reared in it, do so for one reason and one reason only. It is because islamic LAW JUSTIFIES the most evil things men can possibly do.

Anyone can live out their most violent and perverse fantasies and it is not only NOT frowned upon, it is glorified and celebrated as HOLY. It is sanctified in the eyes of a god AND you will be accepted by your peers.

It doesn’t matter if no such god exists now or ever. islam says it does and that completely obliterates conventional restrictions and utterly murders what is left of the soul. You become positively inhuman; utterly without conscience.

If your neighbor offends you, it is not only justified that you punish them, it is mandatory. If your children offend you, you can kill them with abandondon and it is “honorable.” If you desire to have sex with animals, you are intructed in the proper way. And you know most of the rest.

islam and the hard left:

NOW, I ask you, what is the ONLY difference bewteen what islam teaches and what the left actually does or WANTS to do? And the answer, if you are honest, is nothing.
But here is the thing. The left, even the most hardcore left, still has to operate within the law in most civilized countries. It is no accident that islam has concentrated its recruiting efforts in our prisons. The left has spent centuries trying to operate AROUND the law. islam has its OWN law. And therein lies the ONLY difference.

The left spends its time trying to stamp out any religion that teaches ethics and morals. islam doesn’t need to do that. It was CREATED without those compunctions by a criminally insane, psychopathic, unethical, immoral, degenerate, pathological liar. Anyone who wonders why the left admires and defends islam needs to understand that the left, especially in THIS country, grew up in a civilization where morals and ethics and Biblical Laws like the Ten Commandments meant something.

The left is fighting G-d and those who either believe in G-d or live by godly principles. islam has created its own. It is an entire erzatz civilization which has spilled out into the world. The two are compatible in more ways than you can imagine and BOTH are incompatible in OUR civilized world. Beware this as the left awakens to that fact, it will not be only the overt criminals who convert because the left hates normalcy as much as islam does.

Read the rest.

[Brian Kopp DPM]

WHERE do homosexuals fight and die for their beliefs?

Bugchasing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Human immunodeficiency virus
Scanning electron micrograph of HIV-1 (in green) budding from cultured lymphocyte. Multiple round bumps on cell surface represent sites of assembly and budding of virions.
Virus classification
Group:	Group VI (ssRNA-RT)
Family:	Retroviridae
Genus:	Lentivirus
Species
Human immunodeficiency virus 1 Human immunodeficiency virus 2

Bugchasing is a slang term for the practice of pursuing sexual intercourse with HIV-infected individuals in order to contract HIV. Individuals engaged in this activity are referred to as bugchasers. It is a form of self-harm.

Bugchasers seek sexual partners who are HIV positive for the purpose of having unprotected sex and becoming HIV positive; giftgivers are HIV positive individuals who comply with the bugchaser's efforts to become infected with HIV.

Bugchasers indicate various reasons for this activity. Some bugchasers engage in the activity for the excitement inherent in pursuing such a dangerous activity, but do not implicitly desire to contract HIV.^[1][2] Some researchers suggest that the behavior may stem from a "resistance to dominant heterosexual norms and mores" due to a defensive response by gay men to repudiate stigmatization and rejection by society.^[2]

Some people consider bugchasing "intensely erotic" and the act of being infected as the "ultimate taboo, the most extreme sex act left.^[1]" A number of people who are HIV negative and in a relationship with someone who is HIV positive seek infection as a way to remain in the relationship, particularly when the HIV positive partner may wish to break up to avoid infecting the HIV negative partner.

Some contend that this behaviour stems from feelings of inevitability towards HIV among the gay community and the empowerment of choosing when to contract the virus.^[3] Others have suggested that some people who feel lonely desire the nurturing community that supports people with AIDS.^[2] It may also be a form of suicide.

By design, bug chasing involves unprotected sex, but members of the bareback subculture are not necessarily bugchasers. The difference is intent:

“

In reviewing the scarce unpublished and published materials on bugchasing, as well as general healthcare speculations, a common theme appears- the lumping of bug chasers with barebackers...Although these two groups share some of the same practices, namely unprotected anal intercourse (UAI), there are distinctions that differentiate bug chasing...even though all bug chasers are indeed barebackers, not all barebackers are bugchasers.[4]

”

In simple terms, bugchasers engage in unprotected intercourse because they desire the possibility of infection, and seek out partners with HIV to cause infection. Barebackers engage in unprotected intercourse because they prefer the sensation of it but generally take pains to avoid contracting STIs. While actual activity is the same for both groups the two do not share the same psychology. Barebackers conceptually have the same motivation as heterosexual couples that use non-barrier methods of birth control (more enjoyable sex) and a preference against condom use does not imply a disregard for sexual health.