Posted on 07/02/2013 1:38:34 PM PDT by SJackson
June 20 was World Refugee Day, dedicated to nearly 60 million people worldwide who were forcibly displaced by conflict or persecution. One group of refugees rarely acknowledged is the Jews who were indigenous to Muslim lands but compelled to flee around the time that the State of Israel was established.
A Google search for 1948 refugees produces about 6 million results. All but a few (at least through page six) are about the Palestinian Arab refugees, as if they were the only refugees of 1948. But it is estimated that from the beginning of the 1948 ArabIsraeli War through the early 1970s, up to 1,000,000 Jews fled or were expelled from their ancestral homes in Muslim countries. 260,000 of those refugees reached Israel between 1948 and 1951 and comprised 56% of all immigration to the fledgling state. By 1972, their numbers had reached 600,000.
In 1948, Middle East and North African countries had considerable Jewish populations: Morocco (250,000), Algeria (140,000), Iraq (140,000), Iran (120,000), Egypt (75,000), Tunisia (50,000), Yemen (50,000), Libya (35,000), and Syria (20,000). Today, the indigenous Jews of those countries are virtually extinct (although Morocco and Iran each still has under 10,000 Jews). In most cases, the Jewish population had lived there for millennia.
Few know this history because the Jewish refugees of 1948 were granted citizenship by the countries to which they fled, including Israel. By contrast, many Muslim countries refused to integrate the Palestinian refugees, preferring to leave them as second-class citizens in order to maintain a domestic demographic balance and/or a political problem for Israel.
Media bias also explains why so few people know about the 1948 Jewish refugees from Muslim lands. A search for 1948 refugees on the BBC news site generates 41 articles (going back to 1999); 40 discuss the Palestinian Arab refugees of 1948. Only three of those 40 (dated 9/22/11, 9/2/10, and 4/15/04) even mention the Jewish refugees from Muslim lands, and two do so only in a single, superficial sentence that presents the issue as a claim rather than a historical fact.
A search for 1948 refugees Jews from Arab lands on the New York Times site produces 497 results (replacing Arab with Muslim halves the results), while 1948 Palestinian refugees yields 1,050 results. Consider a comparison using Sri Lanka, another war-torn, multi-ethnic country that gained its independence from Britain in 1948. The nearly 26-year ethnic conflict there began in 1983 and claimed 80,000100,000 lives, many multiples of the total casualties from the nearly 100-year Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Sri Lankas conflict also produced hundreds of thousands of refugees, including at least 200,000 Tamil refugees in Western Europe alone. Yet a search for Tamil refugees generates only 531 articles less than 5% of the 11,300 results for Palestinian Arab refugees.
Institutionalized favoritism at the UN has also enabled the Palestinians to monopolize the refugee issue, which undoubtedly reinforces the medias bias. All non-Palestinian refugees around the world (nearly 55 million) are cared for by the U.N. High Commission for Refugees, which works under the guidelines of the Convention on Refugees of 1951. But Palestinian refugees (whose original population was under one million) have a UN agency dedicated exclusively to them (UNRWA).
UNRWAs unique definition of refugee includes anyone whose normal place of residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. So, in addition to families who lived in the area for generations, UNRWAs definition includes any migrants who arrived as recently as 1946 but were then displaced. And because the definition includes descendants of fathers fulfilling the definition, UNRWAs refugee population has grown from 750,000 in 1950 to 5,300,000 today (making resolution of the Palestinian refugee issue even harder). Despite these problems, the United States continues to support UNRWA (with over 4.1 billion dollars since 1950).
The rest of the worlds refugees are assisted by the High Commission, which is mandated to help refugees rapidly rebuild their lives, usually outside the countries that they fled. Jewish refugees from Muslim lands did just that: they rebuilt their lives in Israel and elsewhere. But the fact that they quietly adapted and Israel granted them full citizenship doesnt lessen the wrongs committed by their countries of origin. These Jewish refugees from Muslim lands suffered legal and often violent persecution that resulted in immeasurable emotional and physical loss. They lost billions in property and endured huge socioeconomic disadvantages when forced to rebuild their lives from scratch. Israel was unfairly burdened with the colossal social and economic cost of suddenly absorbing so many refugees. So any suggestion that Jewish refugees from Muslim lands dont deserve compensation is resoundingly wrong.
On the recent World Refugee Day, the Israeli Knesset member Shimon Ohayon, whose family fled Morocco in 1956, called on the Arab League to accept their great responsibility for driving out almost a million Jews from lands [in] which they had lived for millennia. He explained that In 1947, the Political Committee of the Arab League drafted a law that called for the freezing of bank accounts of Jews, their internment and [the confiscation of their assets]. Various other discriminatory measures were taken by Arab nations and subsequent meetings reportedly called for the expulsion of Jews from member states of the Arab League. Ohayon challenged the League to accept responsibility for the ethnic cleansing of the Jewish population from most of the Middle East and North Africa [and] to provide redress to the Jewish refugees.
A just and comprehensive Mideast peace is possible only when Muslim states recognize their role in two historic wrongs: 1) displacing one million indigenous people only because they were Jews, and 2) perpetuating the plight of Palestinian refugees by denying them citizenship. The first wrong requires financial compensation to the families of Jewish refugees from Muslim lands, which reparation can be administered by the states that absorbed them. The second wrong should be remedied by granting full citizenship to Palestinian refugees (and their descendants) who have resettled in Muslim lands. Both wrongs have festered for too many decades.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Somedays I wish we could have re-settled all of the Jews from europe in the united states after WWII, we would have been the better for it in terms of adding brain power.
Of course a number of the ones that did end up settling here were the weaksauce ones that were so weak kneed they vote Dim-o-crat constantly and they shunned their own religion to be come “cultural jews in name only” and couldn’t read hebrew if their lives depended on it, instead opting to learn the language of cultural marxism....
140,000 Jews in Iraq in 1948. By the Iraq war in 2003, there were less than 100 in Baghdad
oh yeah...a very smart 75% Democrat voting block
just like amnesty
thanks anyhow
problem is...very few places from which to import conservatives
Afrikaaners and former oppressed east block folks are about it
Israel is pretty liberal by our standards...at least prior to 2008...it feels to me like demographics have killed us here...unless it’s changed since my time there..a conservative in Israel is not conservative like Alabama
I think it was mid 70s before any party center right or better formed a majority there
Bibi survives thru an odd coalition
early founders at the time of the European refugee crisis were for the most part...very very left wing
but I think Likud now is arguably more conservative than ever before
kadma or whatever you call it sort of screwed stuff up
same result but opposite folks than us if we split from GOP
You’ve painted the picture falsely, Grace. Most who became useful idiots had proud Zionist grandparents who did read Hebrew. The tragedy is that the second and third generations were brainwashed by the Marxist Left to forget that they themselves, the Jews are still the biggest underdog. The New York Times and NPR played a big part. The New York Times even minimized, often omitted the horrors of the Holocaust while they were happening. The schools of theology (Christian and Jewish) and the secular universities became petrie dishes for the growing of the anti-Semitic Arab propaganda machine, spewing lies frequently enough that many have come to believe the big lies. All need to find and study primary source materials of history. Tragic, but not just a Jewish phenomenon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.