As I said, I don’t think it applies here either.
Was only pointing out that getting your head pounded into the pavement does not in and of itself mean your lethal force in response automatically qualifies as self-defense.
Did considerable research on the subject back when all the hollering about “stand your ground” was going on. Stand your ground never applied at all in Zimmerman’s case. Either it was self-defense without SYG or it was illegal homicide of some degree.
In fact, SYG is apparently fairly often misapplied even by the courts here in FL, allowing people to walk who shouldn’t. Not saying that Z is in this group.
I explained what we know now.
With what we know now, I don’t see Zimmerman guilty of anything but defending himself.
Somebody is on top of me and bangs my head on cement, guess what comes next if I’m armed.
KOPEL: Debunking the ‘stand your ground’ myth
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2867469/posts
you are correct.