Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lbryce

Most ambassadors are indeed career diplomats (to my knowledge), but when you realize that the ambassadorships to ALL our most important allies in attractive capitals are ALWAYS filled with POTUSes’ buddies, fundraisers and lobbyists, then you have to ask why we need career diplomats in the first place? Because the likes of Caroline Kennedy would never take up the Burundi post?


69 posted on 07/04/2013 11:37:45 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Revolting cat!
The argument for having prime diplomatic posts filled by fundraisers is that having no experience they will defer to the President. This tends to guarantee a consistent message.

Look what's happening with the egotistical boob Kerry. He has what he considers to be a reasonable approximation to "his own mind" and he is constantly stumbling trying to get Obama's message out.

Granted Obama's message is inherently inconsistent and murky, but Kerry is only making it worse ... if that is possible.

73 posted on 07/04/2013 11:41:56 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson