Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
Either it was self-defense under the law prior to SYG, and under the laws of any other state.

Except the laws of the state of Maryland, where the individual which wrote this screed resides. There, it is "duty to retreat", and *that* is vigorously enforced by TPTB...

In the minds of those who agree with that particular legal insanity (duty to retreat), *anything* other than that becomes, in the black hole which passes for their intellects, the hated and feared "stand your ground"...

the infowarrior

70 posted on 07/05/2013 5:13:24 AM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: infowarrior

If you are on your back, the “duty to retreat” becomes immaterial. You can’t.

I suspect even under the laws of MD, the most likely story for this event would qualify as self-defense.

Whether the state’s officials accept it as such, would of course be another story entirely.

BTW, I believe there are flaws in SYG as a concept, at least as it has been applied here in FL. Some very troubling cases with guys walking who probably shouldn’t.

Most people don’t realize it, but “duty to retreat” is not a modern touchy-feely liberal notion. It is many centuries old in English common law.


73 posted on 07/05/2013 5:35:24 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson