To: ColdOne
He also said Friday that marijuana could have affected Martin physically or mentally, even though he said it didn't last year. Exactly.And it gets even more interesting...the judge ruled that the jury wasn't going to be allowed to hear that opinion.This judge is working for the prosecution.
Nauseating.
5 posted on
07/05/2013 11:23:46 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
To: Gay State Conservative
Take one look at the judge, and you know what you have.
To: Gay State Conservative
Wait... if he testified to the effect of marijuana now, the defense HAS TO be allowed to show he said something else last time
10 posted on
07/05/2013 11:29:17 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
To: Gay State Conservative
This will definitely be grounds for appeal if there’s a ‘guilty’ verdict here. I would the hope the jury has the sense to wonder why toxicology report isn’t allowed in. If it were negative it would be allowed in.
11 posted on
07/05/2013 11:31:18 AM PDT by
Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
(If Americans were as concerned for their country as Egyptians are, Obama would be ousted!)
To: Gay State Conservative
Oh it’s obvious this judge is on the “please don’t make me pay with a beating” team.
13 posted on
07/05/2013 11:41:48 AM PDT by
autumnraine
(America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson