Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SgtBilko
Eh? The Shah only fell because Carter withdrew US support. The other two scenarios were definitely errors on the USA’s part.

Eisenhower was remarkably left wing. The Cold War intensified because of his dovishness focus on “containment” rather than action. Those that followed him were all war doves too.
17 posted on 07/06/2013 7:30:54 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

“The Shah only fell because Carter withdrew US support.”

Does it make a difference ? The shah was a dictator. If he would have treated his people well they wouldn’t have made a revolution in ‘79. With or without support of the US.

It’s almost the same we can see in egypt. Mubarak was a dictator with US support. Zero withdrew US support, the people organized a revolution and got a muzzi regime instead. History repeating ... The only difference is that the egypts dispossed Mursi the muzzi dictator a few days ago while the “green revolution” in Iran couldn’t overcome the muzzi regime.


23 posted on 07/06/2013 2:23:04 PM PDT by SgtBilko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson