http://flightaware.com/live/flight/AAR214/history/20130706/0730Z/RKSI/KSFO/tracklog
I thought you might find it interesting, especially this part:
02:22PM | 37.4333 | -122.0800 | 43° | Northeast | 248 | 285 | 5,900 | -1,620 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4397 | -122.0740 | 37° | Northeast | 249 | 287 | 5,700 | -1,140 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4431 | -122.0710 | 35° | Northeast | 249 | 287 | 5,700 | -900 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4471 | -122.0690 | 22° | Northeast | 248 | 285 | 5,600 | -900 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4513 | -122.0680 | 11° | North | 247 | 284 | 5,600 | -900 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4549 | -122.0670 | 12° | North | 246 | 283 | 5,500 | -900 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4583 | -122.0670 | 360° | North | 246 | 283 | 5,500 | -900 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4628 | -122.0670 | 360° | North | 245 | 282 | 5,400 | -1,500 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4675 | -122.0680 | 350° | North | 244 | 281 | 5,300 | -900 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4709 | -122.0700 | 335° | Northwest | 243 | 280 | 5,300 | -1,020 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4741 | -122.0720 | 334° | Northwest | 242 | 278 | 5,200 | -900 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4774 | -122.0740 | 334° | Northwest | 242 | 278 | 5,200 | -1,020 | FlightAware |
02:22PM | 37.4854 | -122.0810 | 325° | Northwest | 243 | 280 | 5,000 | -1,740 | FlightAware |
02:23PM | 37.4909 | -122.0850 | 330° | Northwest | 243 | 280 | 4,800 | -1,200 | FlightAware |
02:23PM | 37.4941 | -122.0880 | 323° | Northwest | 244 | 281 | 4,800 | -780 | FlightAware |
02:23PM | 37.4973 | -122.0920 | 315° | West | 243 | 280 | 4,700 | -1,740 | FlightAware |
02:23PM | 37.4999 | -122.0960 | 309° | West | 242 | 278 | 4,600 | -900 | FlightAware |
02:23PM | 37.5026 | -122.1010 | 304° | West | 240 | 276 | 4,600 | -540 | FlightAware |
02:23PM | 37.5066 | -122.1100 | 299° | West | 237 | 273 | 4,500 | -840 | FlightAware |
02:23PM | 37.5145 | -122.1280 | 299° | West | 228 | 262 | 4,300 | -540 | FlightAware |
02:23PM | 37.5192 | -122.1390 | 298° | West | 221 | 254 | 4,300 | -240 | FlightAware |
02:24PM | 37.5266 | -122.1570 | 297° | West | 212 | 244 | 4,200 | -720 | FlightAware |
02:24PM | 37.5351 | -122.1760 | 299° | West | 208 | 239 | 3,900 | -960 | FlightAware |
02:24PM | 37.5414 | -122.1910 | 298° | West | 204 | 235 | 3,700 | -1,080 | FlightAware |
02:24PM | 37.5481 | -122.2070 | 298° | West | 203 | 234 | 3,400 | -1,200 | FlightAware |
02:25PM | 37.5548 | -122.2230 | 298° | West | 195 | 224 | 3,100 | -1,140 | FlightAware |
02:25PM | 37.5614 | -122.2390 | 297° | West | 190 | 219 | 2,800 | -1,500 | FlightAware |
02:25PM | 37.5669 | -122.2520 | 298° | West | 187 | 215 | 2,400 | -1,320 | FlightAware |
02:25PM | 37.5730 | -122.2660 | 299° | West | 187 | 215 | 2,200 | -1,080 | FlightAware |
02:26PM | 37.5785 | -122.2790 | 298° | West | 186 | 214 | 1,900 | -1,020 | FlightAware |
02:26PM | 37.5847 | -122.2940 | 298° | West | 178 | 205 | 1,700 | -1,020 | FlightAware |
02:26PM | 37.5900 | -122.3070 | 297° | West | 169 | 194 | 1,400 | -1,380 | FlightAware |
02:27PM | 37.5988 | -122.3270 | 299° | West | 145 | 167 | 800 | -1,380 | FlightAware |
02:27PM | 37.6016 | -122.3340 | 297° | West | 141 | 162 | 600 | -1,320 | FlightAware |
02:27PM | 37.6045 | -122.3410 | 298° | West | 134 | 154 | 400 | -900 | FlightAware |
02:27PM | 37.6073 | -122.3480 | 297° | West | 123 | 142 | 300 | -840 | FlightAware |
02:27PM | 37.6103 | -122.3550 | 298° | West | 109 | 125 | 100 | -120 | FlightAware |
02:28PM | 37.6170 | -122.3740 | 294° | West | 85 | 98 | 200 | 120 | FlightAware |
No, it looks ugly. 1300 fpm rate of descent is very scary. It really is almost twice what is required. A good rule of thumb is half of the ground speed. By that I mean 140 Knots over the ground gives about 700 fpm descent rate on the normal 3 degree glide path. 140 knots is pretty close to the approach speed for the 777’s at UAL (a little slower for flaps 30, a little more for flaps 25).
109 Knots at 100 feet (if I’m reading the numbers correctly) is very, very scary. Even if they would have cleared the sea wall, that is definitely tail strike speed. I don’t know if it was a 777-300, since the are slightly longer, they have a tail skid just in case.
That looks to me like a profile where the engines did not spool up. British Airways had a similar incident happen at Heathrow. They had ice crystals in the fuel lines that prevented spool up on their Rolls Royce engine on short final.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways_Flight_38