Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Redmen4ever
You're right, who started the fight does matter, though as you state not in the context of 2nd degree murder. And the prosecution has presented nothing to support lesser charges. I don't think there's anything to convict him of. I'm puzzled what there was to charge him, other than national media and Executive Branch pressure.

Do we agree than contributing actions could lead to criminal liability? If Zimmerman started the fight, and came out on the short end, legitimately defending himself isn't murder, but there might be something there. Not suggesting that happened.

If I sell a firearm to someone without documentation, required or not, I could be subject to civil or criminal penalties.

If I sell a firearm to known criminals, who use it to kill anyone from a Border Patrol agent to a Police Chief to hundreds of citizens, many probably criminals, of another nation, I'm guilty of nothing.

Go figure.

33 posted on 07/10/2013 5:49:22 PM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

On the matter of civil liability, the standard is preponderance of evidence (or, who has the most). As we know from the OJ trial, you can meet this standard and not meet the standard for criminal conviction of beyond reasonable doubt. But, what money could they get from George Zimmerman? Even if he were found liable, he’d simply declare bankruptcy and walk away. He wouldn’t even need a lawyer. Just defend yourself pro se and let the other side spend hundreds of thousands of dollars for the possibility of nothing.


40 posted on 07/10/2013 9:57:57 PM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson