Posted on 07/10/2013 9:16:06 AM PDT by mojito
It gets worse.
Apparently, the government burned up his body via cremation, and sent him home in an ashcan.
.......ALL done mysteriously.
.......ALL done against the wishes of Michael’s family.
Hastings was murdered, and his body was burned to ashes against the will of the family.
No autopsy either.
Just an “accident” and then ashes for the reporter who wrote to friends about breaking a huge story about 0bama’s corruption.
Boogieman is a paid mole if I ever saw one around here.
A Reagan Conservative, he most certainly is not.
PS..
Check out my link on Michael Hastings being reduced to a few ashes against the will of his family.
You do grope for straws to make worthless points. Who controls you?
Again, I’ll point out that it’s common courtesy to ping other FReepers if you are going to talk about them.
As for being paid, whoever is supposed to be paying me hasn’t sent me dime one, why don’t you tell them to stop being cheapskates? I could use the extra cash.
LMFAO... if the point is so worthless, why are you continuing to engage in paranoid thinking by accusing me of being “controlled”?
Possibly so.
Left-leaning reporters that are not “clued in” at the highest levels of global finance and espionage are simple unknowing minions of the financial oligarchy.
They don’t realize that the “left” is really a contrivance of the financial oligarchy, which also has assassins at its disposal. If they understood what the “left” is, they’d be cynical enough to come to terms with the fact that the so-called populist or socialist movements they work for are really a complete fake movement, and they are all working to uphold the enslavement of the ignorant masses on behalf of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful elites. If they had such an understanding, they would simply stick to reporting on officially sanctioned stories and help to cover up whenever asked; which is what the leadership of the news media does, which is why they were promoted to leadership positions in the first place.
Most reporters stay “in line” simply because they want their career to progress, but occasionally an ambitious one will think they are “on to something big” and pursue a story that crosses the line of what the “masters” will tolerate.
Not even knowing who the real “masters” are or the full extent of the real organization, the ambitious reporter has no idea of the wider implications of his story and the lengths to which the “masters’” operatives will routinely go to eliminate “problems”. It’s analagous to the reporter being a member of the mafia but not knowing that they are a member, then investigating a story that threatens the “bosses”. They would be “wacked”, but never even really know by who or the full extent of why, because they would not know all the dealings of the “bosses”, ergo, which toes they were really stepping on that brought on the “wacking”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.