Without 100% of the fence being built. Immigration reform should be off the table.
Let’s focus on jobs, killing Obamacare and other policies of this administration that is destroying this country.
The WSJ is shilling for cheap labor. How about putting your fellow citizens ahead of profit for once you idiots? For a group that prides itself on being for free markets why do they insist on forcing through a bill that is anti-free market? This bill has artificial wages structures negociated between unions and business interests that have nothing to do with an employees skills or output. Last time I checked wages in a free market were determined by those to aspects alone. Quite frankly if your business can’t survive without paying a fair market wage you don’t deserve to keep your doors open.
WSJ gone full-blown lib.
I certainly don’t subscribe to the notion that the Repubs are confused. This “meeting” should not even be happening. They are a bunch of self-serving politicians concerned primarily with their “jobs” and keeping the ability to gain far more money and power than they would as mortal citizens working for a living, than they are serving the American public and preserving America as a Constitutional Republic based in law.
And people wonder why their performance rating with real Americans in our population, is in the tank. MANY of them need to be replaced. They are sitting watching America burn.
With modern technology, it is certainly a practical as well as sensible policy. The alternative is chaos, where we lose practical control of our own domains.
Unfortunately, the internationalist propagandists for undermining the very concept of a nation--those who seek new "world orders"--have hit upon the carrot to undermine rational thinking among many of the cadres of Corporate management, that is by total, myopic focus on short-term business interests, in dollars & cents, without regard to what those dollars & cents will actually buy. Thus the Journal is more interested in the imagined benefit of huge numbers of unemployed & underemployed workers, to keep labor costs down. They also see the more people, the more customers for their products & services; also as a cure to the languishing housing market in many areas.
Lest anyone in those bemused cadres reflect on the longer term consequences of trying to integrate culturally very different populations into stable communities; or observe that people create their culture, not the other way around, and that more and more of California is increasingly more like Mexico than America, the would be thought police of the Left, silence them from voicing such concerns with the usual litany of slanders, "racist," "bigot," "elitist," etc..
We saw how effective this smear technique was, a few weeks ago, in forcing the young Conservative scholar, Jason Richwine out of the Heritage Foundation. See Jason Richwine Incident.
The Wall Street Journal would do well to stick to financial analysis, and not try to promote major changes in the demographic characteristics of the population.
Those of us, who want to preserve the America that we inherited, will find it absolutely necessary to ignore the advice offered in this article.
William Flax
The WSJ have always been open border hacks.
They represent the country clubber wing. What the hell do they care if the middle class is destroyed and replaced with low wage drones.
How on earth are people who are in this country illegally deserving of "citizenship"? McCain and his Gang of 8 have NO respect for our nation as they are unwilling to enforce our laws and won't enforce any "new" ones as as their past clearly shows. ZIP except for a few feet of fencing.
Call speaker Boehner
Phone: (202) 225-0600
Fax: (202) 225-5117
This is one topic where the WSJ (and the Catholic Church as well) have been sniffing glue. What about the rule of law? What good are these laws going to do if you can’t even enforce the current ones?
For the most part however, the editorial section remains reliably conservative, and the news section, while surely teeming with libs, is not so over-the top, especially in comparison to a typical city-based liberal rag.
The good thing too is, the readers of the WSJ will skewer this ridiculous viewpoint in the letters section in the coming days.
Wow, what happened to the Wall Street Journal?
Didn’t they used to frown on communism?
” We support this path to citizenship”
Thank you for your daily pro-amnesty editorial, you traitorous piece if $hit!
"pro-growth" for Dem voters and leftist policies!
IN ORDER FOR THE HOUSE REPS TO GET ‘UN-CONFUSED’ ABOUT IMMIGRATION COULD SOMEBODY PLEASE SEND BOEHNER AND ANY REPUBLICAN WHO IS SQUISHY ON THE EVILS OF THIS IMMIGRATION BILL..... ANN COULTER’S GREAT INSTRUCTIONS ON THE THE NEED TO KILL THE BILL, JEEEESH!..
http://www.teaparty.org/ann-coulter-u-s-finished-if-amnesty-passes-25564/
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/06/21/ann-coulter-hannity-blasts-gop-rubio-immigration-amnesty-bill
I have to admit that I would love to be in that room and listen to the debate/discussion - on both sides of the issue.
Just another example of why I gave up reading the WSJ long ago
These internationalists don’t believe in borders. They are ok with the welfare state to take care of al
Securing a nation's borders is a sensible policy for any century if you would like continued existence of the nation.