Skip to comments.
Judge Snaps at Zimmerman Atty After He Objects to Her Asking Whether Zimmerman Will Testify
The Blaze ^
| 10 July, 2013
| Madeleine Morgenstern
Posted on 07/10/2013 12:33:25 PM PDT by Errant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-183 next last
To: Errant
“No Judge, given your obvious bias against me, I don’t plan to testify beyond all the information I’ve previous supplied in various forms.”
21
posted on
07/10/2013 12:43:25 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: EQAndyBuzz
22
posted on
07/10/2013 12:43:50 PM PDT
by
laplata
(Liberals don't get it. Their minds have been stolen.)
To: popdonnelly
If the jury was in the courtroom at that moment, it appears as though the judge is trying to create the implication that Z's decision not to testify indicates guilt.
23
posted on
07/10/2013 12:44:20 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: Errant
That’s probably grounds for appeal right there if she did it in front of the jury. But since I doubt Zimmerman will be convicted then it’s pretty much a moot point.
24
posted on
07/10/2013 12:44:47 PM PDT
by
0.E.O
To: thorvaldr
Pigs should not wear black robes. It makes their snouts look funny...
25
posted on
07/10/2013 12:44:51 PM PDT
by
Bshaw
(A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
To: MIchaelTArchangel
“If Zimmerman is convicted, the judge asking that question in front of the jury will likely trigger to events:
1. A new trial for Zimmerman and”
I’m with you. This has appeal written all over it if it goes south for Zimmerman.
26
posted on
07/10/2013 12:45:06 PM PDT
by
Stormdog
(A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
To: Sarah Barracuda
This judge is a huge POS..she is practically begging Zimmerman to testify..she is salivating for it..just shows what side she is rooting for..Zimmerman would be an absolute fool to testify, he has already won the case Or she is trying to make the point to the jury that he is not testifying, over and over again. She did everything except say, "Well if you are innocent, what do you have to hide?"
Increadible. The defense had not even finished calling witnesses. If Zimmerman were to say one thing now, and change his mind later, in response to the witnesses yet to be called, what is the jury to do with that information?
27
posted on
07/10/2013 12:45:14 PM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(Gun Control Haiku: Say "Registration" / And they call you paranoid / So say "Privacy")
To: Errant
The judge should direct her questions to Zimmerman’s attorney, that’s why he’s there!!
28
posted on
07/10/2013 12:45:25 PM PDT
by
TexasCajun
(Creepy-Ass Cracker)
To: 1rudeboy
"If the jury was in the courtroom at that moment, it appears as though the judge is trying to create the implication that Z's decision not to testify indicates guilt."
Absolutely. Focusing that much attention on the defendants decision as to whether to testify, especially when there were more defense witnesses to call, would be reversible error in any court in the country.
To: SpinnerWebb
Judge Nelson said "There is
substantial evidence, both direct and circumstantial to allow this charge to go to the jury"
Ohhhh REALLY? Where? All that I've seen supports Zimmerman's claims 100%.
To: laplata
After seeing a photograph of the subject, it is my professional opinion that this is a man masquerading as a woman. Kinda like a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
31
posted on
07/10/2013 12:47:01 PM PDT
by
sport
To: Sarah Barracuda
As always, Sarah, I agree with YOU. She was practically telling him he had to testify! She wouldn’t let it drop.
To: Errant
33
posted on
07/10/2013 12:47:41 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
To: Errant
I wish Zimmerman would have said, “Not if you are going to ask the questions”?
To: Haiku Guy
I think the jury was out of the room.
To: liberalh8ter
This judge is to this trial what Candy Crowley was to the Presidential debate.Bump that!
To: Sarah Barracuda
Doesn’t matter. There was never a case. The cops proved that from the outset.
To: Rock N Jones
38
posted on
07/10/2013 12:50:23 PM PDT
by
Errant
To: sport
After seeing a photograph of the subject, it is my professional opinion that this is a man masquerading as a woman. Kinda like a wolf in sheeps clothing.
You’re right about that. I bet she has butched hair and that’s a wig.
39
posted on
07/10/2013 12:51:07 PM PDT
by
laplata
(Liberals don't get it. Their minds have been stolen.)
To: circlecity
“I certainly hope that exchange wasnt in front of the jury.”
If it wasn’t in front of the jury, there would be no objection.
40
posted on
07/10/2013 12:51:22 PM PDT
by
keats5
(Not all of us are hypnotized.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-183 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson