Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: headstamp 2

“It’s a type of intimidation.”

More a matter of planting the idea in the jurors’ mind that if he doesn’t testify he must be guilty.


65 posted on 07/10/2013 1:01:34 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin
Reportedly, the jury was not present.

So, it's more likely she was simply hoping to convince him to ignore his lawyers and testify and thereby give the prosecution a crack at tripping him up.

131 posted on 07/10/2013 3:19:14 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson