Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gen.Blather
Here is the Merkava. You could say the same thing about our Black Hawks. They're easily taken out by guerillas with RPGs. But does that mean we stop using Black Hawks?
4 posted on 07/11/2013 6:23:39 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: MinorityRepublican; Gen.Blather

Why don’t they put a large sacrificial dome or cone on the back? Have it detachable, when you get to a combat area, hook it on. It gets blown off, put another on.

Hell, load the thing with claymores or something equivalent to detonate in the direction of the missile.


8 posted on 07/11/2013 7:04:39 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (sue the DNC for the IRS abuse! Can RICO laws be used against the DNC?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

“Here is the Merkava. You could say the same thing about our Black Hawks. They’re easily taken out by guerillas with RPGs. But does that mean we stop using Black Hawks”

It probably has to do with battlefield statistics. Let’s say a Blackhawk is vulnerable during 3% of its mission. So, the probablility of getting shot down is P*3%*mission time. But the Merkava is vulnerable during 100% of its mission. So, the probability of destruction is P*100%*(Days,weeks,months.)


11 posted on 07/12/2013 3:25:50 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson