Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zimmerman lawyer says Martin was lying in wait to attack
Observer ^ | Friday, July 12, 2013 2:38:33 EDT PM | Daniel Trotta and Barbara Liston

Posted on 07/12/2013 11:56:50 AM PDT by Red Steel

SANFORD, Fla. - Trayvon Martin spent four long minutes preparing to attack George Zimmerman, time when he lay in wait before throwing the first punch in a confrontation that ended in his death, Zimmerman's defence lawyer said in closing arguments on Friday.

Lead defence lawyer Mark O'Mara attempted to shift the blame to Martin, the unarmed, black 17-year-old whom Zimmerman shot dead last year. O'Mara told the jury there was "factual and undeniable evidence" that Zimmerman should be found not guilty. ... To convict Zimmerman of second-degree murder, a charge that could lead to a sentence of life in prison, the jury must find he acted with ill will, spite or hatred.

The hateful person that rainy night was Martin, not Zimmerman, O'Mara told the jury.

"Somebody decided they were angry. Ticked off. Ill will, spite or hatred," O'Mara said. "It wasn't some cop wannabe.

"The person who decided this was going to continue, was going to become a violent event, was the guy who didn't go home when he had a chance to. It was the guy who decided to lie in wait," O'Mara said.

(Excerpt) Read more at theobserver.ca ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: asscracker; blackkk; dissed; florida; georgezimmerman; trayvon; trayvonmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 07/12/2013 11:56:50 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

It was obvious from the 4 minute delay, during which Martin was only 300 feet from home.

Plus the ass whooping taken by Zimmerman.


2 posted on 07/12/2013 12:03:20 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

The story at your link is not the same as what you posted here. Did the site scrub that info? Are they already removing the best arguments for his innocence from the MSM coverage to increase the likelihood of rioting should he be found not guilty?


3 posted on 07/12/2013 12:05:44 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

The source changed the article.


4 posted on 07/12/2013 12:08:04 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Williams

“Ass whooping”? You apparently haven’t see a person whose ass has been whooped. I’ve gotten hurt worse for fun...


5 posted on 07/12/2013 12:08:21 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

What? That poor innocent child?


6 posted on 07/12/2013 12:09:54 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
We had a black male (don't know relationship if any) shoot a 22-year-old white mother of a bi-racial little girl a couple weeks ago. The NYT and the other national media outlets don't care about that. And there's a huge difference. I doubt she was shot in self defense but in cold blood.

And there is no indication that she ambushed him, bloodied and broke his nose and banged his head on cement.

People care locally, of course, wasn't a huge racial issue made of it.

7 posted on 07/12/2013 12:11:23 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Since the source changed the article for the worse, here’s another snippet.

” “The person who decided this was going to continue, was going to become a violent event, was the guy who didn’t go home when he had a chance to. It was the guy who decided to lie in wait,” O’Mara said. “ Earlier, O’Mara warned jurors against filling in holes in the prosecution’s case, cautioning against making presumptions and assumptions.
...

Yet he invited them to form their own conclusions about Martin, particularly in the four-minute gap that O’Mara said passed between Zimmerman’s losing sight of Martin and when Martin attacked.

He dramatized that length of time by pausing for four minutes, leaving the courtroom silent.

“Four minutes. You get to figure out what Trayvon Martin was doing,” O’Mara told the jury. “Four minutes to do what? To run home. To walk home.” “


8 posted on 07/12/2013 12:12:20 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
the unarmed, black 17-year-old

Yes, the 6 ft. 2 in., 185 lb. child with tattoos all over his face, neck, hands and gold teeth with marijuana in his blood.

9 posted on 07/12/2013 12:12:30 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

I’ve been informed that the actual parameters were 5’11”, 158 lbs. But that seems a bit skinny.


10 posted on 07/12/2013 12:13:57 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Hurry up and come back wif dat verdict! There's a lot of people waitin to git them free TVs!


11 posted on 07/12/2013 12:16:09 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmy; MrB

George Zimmerman defense attorney Mark O’Mara used physical exhibits in his closing argument to demonstrate to the jury the size disparity between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin. Martin was 5’11 and 158 lbs. at the time, while George Zimmerman clocked in at a clinically obese 5’7” and 204 lbs.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/07/12/Zimmerman-defense-silhouettes


12 posted on 07/12/2013 12:17:40 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
preparing to attack George Zimmerman ... shift the blame to Martin, the unarmed, black 17-year-old
Interesting how Zimmerman is just described as George Zimmerman, while Martin is the "black 17-year-old."
Nope, no bias there.
13 posted on 07/12/2013 12:18:08 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Martin, the unarmed, black 17-year-old...

The press never fails to mention that Treyvon was unarmed. But what they fail to point out is that Martin thought that Zimmerman was unarmed too. That is why he jumped him!

Martin thought he had the advantage. But he didn't...

14 posted on 07/12/2013 12:18:59 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Yep and that is what has brought me comfort about this case. I hate the idea of a young person, having been abused and neglected by his parents and government and community- and robbed of his chance at the American dream and good education ,being used in the way his community has profited upon his death.

But he was lying in wait. That is all I needed to know. Proverbs 1:18

These men lie in wait for their own blood; they ambush only themselves!

15 posted on 07/12/2013 12:19:13 PM PDT by Truth2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

The defense was restricted to the evidence, ergo this line of defense for their case.

But... it doesn’t make sense. Most young punks, if they got ‘home’ (which Trayvon did) would not go back out IN THE RAIN , risking ARREST, BY THEMSELVES, to go beat up on a white dude.

There had to be something ‘incriminating’ or ‘desperately needed’ that led Trayvon to go back to the same area where Detective Serino stated that a ‘burglary tool’ of some kind was found behind the bushes (near where George said he thought Trayvon had come out of ).

Trayvon was looking for it, and heard George. He knew he was screwed. Now he had no choice, he was going to have to make sure this guy couldn’t call the cops, or ID him.

If Trayvon got in trouble with the cops of the Neighborhood Watch , his Daddy might kick him ‘out’ of Brandy’s townhouse. His Daddy had already warned him. Even Rachel warned him. She told him to stay there, assumed he had. I don’t think she lied about it. That means there must have been some OVERWHELMING reason to leave the safety of that back yard.

Trayvon might have been into some street fighting, but he wasn’t a KNOCKOUT KING like everyone thinks. He was more into B+E.

WHY then would he leave? I don’t think it was to beat up George. It had to be something important enough that it was worth the ‘risk’ to go back and get it.


16 posted on 07/12/2013 12:19:19 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

nothing says ‘I support civil rights’ better than stealing a big flat screen TV and beer.


17 posted on 07/12/2013 12:20:15 PM PDT by qwerty1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
“Four minutes. You get to figure out what Trayvon Martin was doing,”

He was looking for whatever he left in the bushes that George said Trayvon might have come out of (it was dark). Something so important that Trayvon left the safety of his Daddy's back yard, and against Rachel's plea to stay there, to go back and get.

Running into George again was not in his plan, so he had to try and make sure George couldn't call the cops or ID him.

So, the sucker punch and beating into unconsciousness.

Good plan, except George had a gun.

18 posted on 07/12/2013 12:23:50 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

Ah, 5’11” 158 lbs. with a tattoo of his mother’s name on his wrist and a pair of praying hands with his deceased grandmother’s and great-grandmother’s names. No grillwork I’m aware of and trace marijuana - may have been as many as 30 days old.


19 posted on 07/12/2013 12:30:16 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I wonder how many B&E’s or home invasions have happened in that gated community since Martin was killed.


20 posted on 07/12/2013 12:32:45 PM PDT by Stingray (Stand for the truth or you'll fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson