Replies

A truely bizzare ruling. All the law does is clarify the definition of what is concealed carry, from a vague previous definition that was being used to stop open carry.

1 posted on 07/12/2013 2:53:55 PM PDT by marktwain

When do we get open carry in Texas? Or was I misinformed?

2 posted on 07/12/2013 2:55:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)

A truely bizzare ruling. All the law does is clarify the definition of what is concealed carry, from a vague previous definition that was being used to stop open carry.

True, it is bizarre; though I really have to ask how it was even possible to stop open carry:

MS Constitution, [Art 3,] SECTION 12. The right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person, or property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall not be called in question, but the legislature may regulate or forbid carrying concealed weapons.

As you can see the only authority the legislature has is over concealed carry. — I suppose that they could resolve this issue by deleting the last 10 words of the section though.

4 posted on 07/12/2013 3:20:36 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)

Kidd should be removed from the bench s.d permanently committed to an insane asylum.

As a matter of fact, I think all judges who render similarly insane judgments be likewise treated.

6 posted on 07/12/2013 3:32:35 PM PDT by ZULU ((See: http://gatesofvienna.net/) Obama, do you hear me?)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794