Trey Gowdy: House Can’t Just Defend the Status Quo on Immigration

...unless one is thinking from the globalist/transnational financial oligarchy viewpoint.

Just finished my third Silva book while on vacation and am pleased that know what you mean by this.

About my rep and the rap he is taking on FR:

(1) Neither Trey Gowdy nor the House of Reps is not the sole enforcer of existing immigration laws; we still sorta have three big ol' branches of government that are responsible for enforcing laws already on the books.

(2) On this and other FR threads, Gowdy is already being voted out of office for posters' suppostions that he has neither said nor even insinuated he would or would not support if and when immigration matters come up for vote in the House. (Judged guilty without facing his accusers or having a fair trial.) Posters are putting all kinds of words in his mouth instead of responding to what he is saying and actually has said. What's up with this, FReepers?

I’m shocked but at the same time not shocked by Mr. Gowdy’s making a move on this issue.

Even the most stalwart politicians come under pressure - or perhaps are not cognisant of the full scope of just how bad the conspiracy is and has been during the 19th and 20th centuries. Remember, schools and universities ingrain our minds with a fantasy history where the role of transnational financial interests is purely financial.

This is to say, a Congressman can be doing the bidding of these folks without realizing it. Or, perhaps intuitively suspecting it, but like most people, consciously trying to avoid admitting it to themselves. It’s quite easily done by simply refraining from reading up on the movers and shakers of history; academia aids us in this by functioning as the curator of history, deciding which current day news stories will be referenced in history books and which will be left to obscurity within old newspapers sputtering out the back end of the news cycle. Thus we are all taught from early childhood that any mention of some “financial oligarchy” is “nuts”.

It would be great if some of his constituents (nudge, nudge) called his office personally and vented their grievances regarding America being the tool of globalism. The whole idea of America accepting the “wretched refuse” from the “teeming shore” is simply the marketing slogan invented by the oligarchy to bolster public support for their import of ultra cheap labor, no matter the consequences for America as a nation. Transational financial interests have zero national loyalty - after all, they profit greatly from war and the destruction it causes.

American Congressmen represent the citizens of America - all their constituents, not just the CEO’s of companies who want to hire people ever more cheaply, even hire illegals, even induce Congress to declare them legal so they can hire them legally.

Yes, it’s true, all three branches have their own responsibility and authority, Notwithstanding it is the responsibility of Congress, in this case, to do nothing if they are not going to pass laws REDUCING and hopefully ELIMINATING immigration until the job situation improves. We already should be deporting illegals when they are found and if we fined businesses employing them enough, the additional risk to them would, for the most part, elminate the job prospects for illegals. This would obviate the need for a multi-billion dollar boondoggle fence. Countries where illegals can’t make good financial gains for themselves do not need a fence to keep them out. Countries where illegals can make good financial gains for themselves will find it very difficult to keep them out.

Placating idiotic and unethical businesses is simply to ruin the economy even more that it is.

Meanwhile, smart and ethical businesses don’t have any desire to hire illegals.

Why is Congress helping the idiotic and the unethical, and harming the smart and ethical ?

Many Americans are not so dumb as to not realize that ANY bill passed in this regard is simply a stepping stone on the way towards wholesale importation of cheap labor.

Globalists were behind the slave trade in the 18th and 19th century.

Globalists were behind the opening up of Communist China - for - you guessed it - cheap labor.

Globalists are behind the move to import cheap slave labor into America as much as possible.

Does Congressman Gowdy see a pattern ? Help him to see.

I’d like to see members of Congress stand up to the financial oligarchy (call it a naive dream) and not be assassinated by them.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.