The point is that these prosecutors were not incompetent. They were crooked. I think it is ridiculous to chalk up this acquittal to their incompetence . They could not have gotten an honest conviction so they resorted to trickery and deceit. They were very good at that.
I agree. All I want to know is if Jackson, Sharpton, Jealous, Matthews, Harris-Perry, etc, etc, have been at all critical of the prosecution; i.e: “didn’t want to convict GZ; sandbagged; threw the trial” os some other nonsense. Why is this so hard to understand?