Thank you for referencing that article BillyBoy. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed against Mr. Mark, the author of the article, and not you.
For the record, I support only traditional one man, one woman marriage.
The problem with article is the following. What pro-gay activist justices and Obama guard dog Fx News don’t want citizens like Mr. Mark to know is that the states have never delegated to Congress, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate marriage. In fact, the Founding States made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the Constitutution’s silence about such issues means that government power to regulate such things are automatically reserved uniquely to the states.
So Mr. Mark’s article wrongly implies, imo, that the idea of the states regulating marriage is nothing more than a matter of opinion when it is actually 10A-protected state power.
See post 43, the “states” argument is an argument for gay marriage.
For the record, you take every chance you can to promote gay marriage.
This thread is about a social liberal rino trying to take a senate seat, and sure enough, you showed up to defend her candidacy because it is the homosexual agenda that we are attacking her on.
You are defending gay marriage in the states it is already in, you are fighting conservatives who are trying to stop it, at the end, just like all the other leftist issues libertarians promote, is gay marriage.
Not only have you been ignoring Cheney being against an amendment, you continue to ignore her support of ending DADT, and the just allowed gay marriage in the military, and federal employment, and in immigration, ALL federal.
I don't know why you think your little fig leaf that you hide behind works.
Even rinos like Romney who have decades of promoting the homosexual agenda, now talk about states rights in a Ted Kennedy argument of "I'm personally opposed to abortion, but.....".