Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Antarctic Evidence Reveals Past Melting
Yahoo! News ^ | 7/22/13 | Becky Oskin - LiveScience.com

Posted on 07/22/2013 12:37:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Noob1999

....................And, where, during the Pliocene epoch between 5.3 million to 2.6 million years ago, was the current continent of Antarctica positioned relative to the equator of earth at the time??......................

Now, I’ll partially answer my own question after a Google session.

During the Pliocene epoch, the warmer waters of the Pacific Ocean were contained within its own basin, as land bridges connecting (what’s now Alaska) to (Russia), as well as another more important land bridge at (Panama) were formed.
These land bridges allowed animals to pass between Asia and North/South America.

But, the primary impact to earth’s climate was for the land bridges to stop the warm waters of the Pacific to intermix with the rest of the earth. Thus, the effect was to drive warm currents south, either past the tip of (South America or (Africa), to intermix with the Indian and Atlantic oceans

Driving warm water toward the regions of Antarctica undoubtedly caused climate change at the bottom of the earth, with much more climate effect than CO2 concentration. However, cutting off the warm water directly flowing into the northern Atlantic would probably result in less northern plant life with which to absorb CO2. This was probably offset by warmer temperatures in the southern hemisphere, able to produce more CO2 absorbing plant life.

I’ll stop my conjecture now, as I don’t certainly don’t want to act like algore, blowing theories out of his ample ass!


21 posted on 07/22/2013 2:09:47 PM PDT by Noob1999 (Loose Lips, Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Air is a mixture; there is no “air molecule”. 1 out of 2500 molecules is correct. O2, N2, H2O, CH4, AR, …etc.


22 posted on 07/22/2013 2:50:00 PM PDT by MeanAsSnake (Humor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeanAsSnake

Air is a perfectly good term and you know it. Or do you say, “I need to get a breath of 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.039% carbon dioxide, and small amounts of other gases”?


23 posted on 07/22/2013 2:55:08 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

We’ve been in an ice age for 3 million years. The earth used to be 6-9 degrees hotter and there was no ice on the planet.


24 posted on 07/22/2013 2:58:21 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Nice try, but WRONG. 400 ppm equates to 1 CO2 molecule per 2500 molecules of air. (Someone check my math.)

Beat me to it. What would you expect from a "Journalista" versus a journalist.
25 posted on 07/22/2013 3:06:13 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Noob1999

Say What? Millions of years? Somebody better tell God, since according to Him (the actual creator of heaven and earth) He created it THOUSANDS of years ago not millions.


26 posted on 07/22/2013 3:16:43 PM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

You mean no snow???? How horrible! And monster bugs! Even worse!


27 posted on 07/22/2013 3:42:52 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Bingo!!!!!!!!


28 posted on 07/22/2013 6:27:50 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (The Stupid Party, they've earned it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“evidence indicates atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide were similar to modern levels of 400 parts per million”

why these scientists must tbe wrong, ‘cause according to today’s climate “concensus” such CO2 levels and temperatures were impossible back then; ‘cause there were no “gas guzzling” SUV’s “despoiling the planet” at that time /sarc


29 posted on 07/22/2013 7:58:47 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Thanks for posting,....these guys are still pumping the propaganda.


30 posted on 07/29/2013 2:51:42 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson