Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArrogantBustard

The P.O. got exactly what they paid for, publicity and exposure. They couldn’t have gotten more bang for the buck at any advertising agency in the world. Whether he was juicing or not is beside the point at this time.

Now, the biggest question is did the P.O. really need to spend the money for advertising? Taxpayers money???


10 posted on 07/25/2013 10:40:46 AM PDT by biff (WAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: biff

Exactly. Why does a public monopsony need to advertise? So we don’t let UPS handle the snail-mail we’re no longer sending?
And this begs an even larger question: why do we allow public agencies like the USPS and IRS to behave as if they are private companies?
Like ‘immigration reform’ and Detroit, put ‘em at the end of a long line (Dept. of Energy, Education, etc.) and let ‘em die.


15 posted on 07/25/2013 10:52:08 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: biff
Now, the biggest question is did the P.O. really need to spend the money for advertising? Taxpayers money???

EXACTLY!

Ya know, I was caught all sorts of flames when I tried to tell FReepers what he was really like and that folks in Austin knew what a jerk he was. Oh, well.

21 posted on 07/25/2013 11:18:49 AM PDT by bgill (This reply was mined before it was posted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson