Posted on 07/26/2013 6:22:32 AM PDT by LucianOfSamasota
The police chief had better be careful. The Feds are known to revoke those permits at a drop of a hat, and so can the State of Pennsylvania.
(The permits dictate that the LEO must have good reason to carry the automatic weapon, IE he/she is a member of a SWAT or comparably trained tactical team. This guy is not.)
One video of a guy shooting a gun without one single word said in the video. Nothing about shooting libtards out of trees, in fact there was nobody even shooting up in a tree.
Pretty much the article is just a liberal rant about nothing.
He’s a poster boy for them. Remember the woman who carried the sign ‘racist and proud’ or some such crap? Every paper carried her picture. She was a fake - a liberal trying to make conservatives look bad. The story about this cop will run through all the liberal hate groups because like the fake ‘protester’ is makes liberals feel good.
Someone needs to check out this guy’s political history and see if he’s another fake.
I always thought it was “suped-up?” Super makes more sense than soup to me.
/johnny
So did I, in the Marine Corps.
What I was questioning was, is it a real M-16 or an AR-15?.......
I would seriously like to live in this guy’s jurisdiction. I’ve long since wearied of being polite to would-be tyrants.
If you're reading enemedia, pretend for a moment that you're reading Der Angriff in about 1938 and lend it the same credence, especially as far as any expression of opinion is concerned.
More Salon agitprop, I wouldn't worry about it too much. But some folks should be careful what they wish for. For example, I heard an unusually earnest gun prohibitionist insisting that the Second Amendment meant that only the militia could have firearms. "Hey, that's a great idea!" I said to her, "I'm gonna join a militia! That's what you want, right?" The deer-in-the-headlights look I got was priceless.
and weak freepers post in droves of “he gives us bad names, oh no”.
And people here wonder why the left steamrolls the right.
Any LE that stands up to tyranny is what I want too.
Soft, sweet, naïve, well spoken leaders ain’t cutting it today. It just means you will be taken advantage of or crushed at a later date by those who are running show today.
“stupid” doesn’t win fights.
And neither does big talk.
My guess is we’ll both get the chance to stand for liberty before its done.
Then we’ll see.
no, our side will vanquish tyranny via debate, and when that fails against the sledgehammer progressives, we can fall back to forceful equivocation.
Then why does the far left and weak sister 'conservatives' get their panties in a bunch when real conservatives speak out and act out in a lawful and moral manner?
Sorry if it makes some so-called 'conservatives' uncomfortable. Real conservatives need to push hard just like the far left does. It scares the crap out of them.
/johnny
Intimidation, mob rule, and bullying are the tools of the godless left.
You can't beat them by joining them.
You can't beat them by rolling over and playing Mr nice guy either. That tactic is PROVEN to not work.
/johnny
I agree.
We stand firmly on our principles and push back every chance we get.
But not like the left - by impugning the character of our opponent with lies and distortions. I will not stoop to their level.
I'm glad to see someone operating within the law get loud and obnoxious and scare the crap out of the left.
It's a shame that it scares some so-called conservatives just as badly.
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.