That's saying something.
Posted on 07/26/2013 7:21:13 PM PDT by Libloather
**SNIP**
He was devious enough to have the name Carlos Danger as an alias during his sexting and phone-sex bouts. Now the press has found Sydney Leathers, the young woman who was the recipient of Weiner's lust. She wants money for her story, CNN reports with negative innuendo -- while it, too, wants to make money off of her story. Smear the girl before she can say, "My name is…" if she will not play cricket with CNN.
But after reviewing Weiner's politics, I wonder if the Democrats are not losing a good candidate. Weiner was the only member of Congress who had the guts to call the Republicans on what they were doing. When Republicans are caught in sex scandals, they stay. Look at Rep. Mark Sanford, who lied by saying he was hiking the Appalachian Trail when he was in the throes of an affair in Argentina. Or David Zitter, who paid a prostitute yet remained in the Senate.
When all the scandal clears the political air, is Weiner a good candidate? Supporters say he would be the best candidate were it not for his addiction. What to do with your vote?
(Excerpt) Read more at movies.yahoo.com ...
Man how do we keep coming up with these lose lose choices?
There are others if Wiener gets it cut off or something aren’t there?
Forget it, Jake, it’s New York City.
My name is Ingo Subaru, you killed my Peugeot, prepare to die...
NO - I bet he can still win.
America’s destiny is to humiliate itself.
Weiner wants NY to give him another chance to display his inadequacies.
He has no other possible career to turn to. Huma can always trade on her relationship with Hillary, but he is toast. So he better stay in the race and hope for the best. After all..Bloomberg made it. Another putz.
Heck, no! I love watching hypocritical Dems make complete asses of themselves....
Dear Raul B.,
Glad you are finally using your real name.
It fits me well. ;>)
I thought it was a poll. Answer: No, he’s actually pretty moral for a democrat.
Yes, Rudy said that Weiner was always a strange guy, never did anything while in Congress (probably too busy with his phone), and nobody liked him.
How do these people get in power? It’s like Hillary. What did she every accomplish? Nothing. I don’t understand why there are enough dummies out there who think someone is qualified to be in office just because of name recognition.
That's saying something.
Maybe it takes one weirdo to know one. We live in strange times.
Weiner will cut the mustard!!
Cool! My porn name is Max Mountain!
Actually, I hope he stays in and wins. What a circus it would be, and what a highlight and spotlight for displaying typical Democrat ethics and morality. They want “anything goes” let them have it, all the better and a great way to show the low information voters what “progressive” means.
More to the point he could actually lose the general election, any of the other rats are unlikely to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.