Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10
Again, who cares about federal lawmaker’s stances on gay marriage since the states have never delegated to the feds, via the Constitution, the specific power to address marriage issues.

The federal government has ALWAYS had to have it's definition of legal marriage for using among it's own employees.

Today the military and federal government accepts homosexual marriage for itself, and as we can see, all states will recognize it, whether they allow the actual ceremony within their borders or not.

36 posted on 07/27/2013 5:00:03 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Santorum appeared on CBS and pronounced George Zimmerman guilty of murder, first degree. March-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12; All
The federal government has ALWAYS had to have it's definition of legal marriage for using among it's own employees.

Please reference the oldest federal code defining legal marriage for federal employment purposes. Also please explain why the feds established DOMA if the code was already in the books.

Also please explain why such codes don't violate Clause 3 of Article VI, the prohition of religious tests to be a public servant, since such marriages are associated with the Christian faith.

40 posted on 07/27/2013 5:09:38 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson