Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58
IF there were indeed strong, consistent, legal opinions on your side of the argument, at any time in history, there would be a LIVING LEGAL AUTHORITY, today, telling us about it!

Since you don't understand what is an ad populum fallacy, i'm pretty sure you also don't understand what is a non sequitur.

You simply don't realize that we are laughing at your ignorance and simple-mindedness. Jeff is just a deluded crank, but you are a childish fool. At least you are entertaining. Jeff isn't. He makes you work to refute his lies and misdirection.

Jeff and Kansas58 depicted below.

268 posted on 07/29/2013 1:27:57 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Again with the Saul Alinsky type insults?

If what you claim to be true really was the law, why don't you have any support to speak of?

And YES, POPULAR SUPPORT MATTERS! The POLITICAL BRANCHES of government, the States and Congress, were expressly given the power to decide these matters. They do so through the political process, they interpret the law but they are subject to political will, as was intended by the Founders.

Argument from authority is valid.
Popular support is valid.
Legal authority is valid.

All three of the above are valid arguments against you. Our Constitution EXPRESSLY gives the power to determine eligibility to POLITICAL professionals.

Political decisions are to be expected and to be supported as LAW in these matters.

297 posted on 07/29/2013 2:24:14 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson