If you’re that opposed to public school, why would you want your child representing that school as a football player? Or are you opposed to all aspects of public school unless they have a good football team?
It's not about me; It's about those taxpayers who feel their home-schooled kids are entitled to compete in a sports program at facilities paid for in part by...these same particular taxpayers.
Are you opposed to all aspects of public school unless they have a good football team?
Perhaps you should follow some of the thread in order to understand the context. That said, I have minimal respect for the publik skools system.