Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the scotsman

You better find a way to debunk the UK media or add a /S to your post.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1324194/Mohammed-popular-baby-boys-ahead-Jack-Harry.html

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/benleapman/100010043/mohammed-now-no1-baby-boys-name-in-london/

http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/move-over-jack-uk-has-a-new-most-popular-name-for-baby-boys-20101028-1744f.html

Just a few that have not been debunked yet............


47 posted on 07/30/2013 7:09:57 AM PDT by Chief901 ("Peace is that brief glorious moment when everybody stands around reloading".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Chief901

Mohammed is only no1 IF you take every last variant of the name, something you can do with most first names. Without variants, its something like no54. And all that means is Muslim parents have a shocking lack of imagination.

Don’t believe me?. Google the most popular UK names and youll see the real top names like Jack and Oliver, no variants, only names on their own.

Naturalman1975, our anglo-aussie freeper, nailed this myth here the first time it was posted about 18 months ago. He used other examples to explain the variants and how this story uses them to make Mohammed apparently no1, when the actual truth is that its not no1 and is nowhere near it.


50 posted on 07/30/2013 8:58:34 AM PDT by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson