To: FlJoePa
So, you are saying that it NEVER happened to anyone under the age of 18... ever? They all testified they where touched and sexually abused. Do you think they all were lieing??? Really? All of them?
Why would his own kid ask to be emancipated? Get real.
The whole response is just why child abusers should get the death penalty. They are never, ever, cured and have a recidivism rate of nearly 100% over time. That is not worth any risk of cure or normalcy for anyone.
They are pathetic slime. What do you think? Should they ever get a chance to molest/abuse again? Is any chance worth it? If a child abuser knows they may even think of it again, they should just stay away from kids. Forever.
Do you agree or disagree, and why?
28 posted on
07/30/2013 6:56:10 PM PDT by
JSteff
(It was ALL about SCOTUS... We are DOOMED for several generations. . Who cares? The Dems care!)
To: JSteff
Again, you’re applying 2013 knowledge to events of 2001.
Read my post #22 in this thread.
30 posted on
07/30/2013 7:17:44 PM PDT by
FlJoePa
("Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good")
To: JSteff
‘Why would his own kid ask to be emancipated? Get real. ‘
I can answer that one. Upon conviction Sandusky lost whatever pension Penn St was paying him. This kid chimed in at the last minute to become eligible for the civil suit funds being set aside by Penn St.
Money talks.
35 posted on
07/30/2013 7:42:26 PM PDT by
Delta Dawn
(Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson