Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne

Yea.........Agenda 21 stuff. I went to their website. Its the “New Urbanist” dream of everyone rides a bicycle and real estate in the core is unbelievably expensive so the proletariat workers have to spend an hour or more on a bus to a 600 square ft apt. that costs $1,000.00 a month 60 miles from the elitist haven of the “Urban” scape. In sum: Portland Oregon.

In the new normal of no middle class and no prosperity where the best job anyone can find is serving coffee at Starbucks, I guess it will somehow work out.


2 posted on 07/31/2013 12:41:26 PM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rich21IE
Yes, it is definitely Agenda 21-oriented. However, he has a point about the un-sustainability of the suburban lifestyle -- that the cost of the maintenance of the infrastructure must be consistent with the tax base using it.

Perhaps their are 2 different solutions: the city warrens we hear about, with lots of homes close together (like 'projects'?), but also the rural solution -- homes on main roads with wells and and septic systems (or outhouses?!?), so the infrastructure is small and sustainable.

3 posted on 07/31/2013 1:29:51 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Rich21IE

Well, if we are robbing Peter to pay Paul for 60+ years what we have been doing is not sustainable.

Why do you think so many cities are going broke?

Seems like our developments have been Ponzi schemes since just after WWII


6 posted on 07/31/2013 1:54:23 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson