Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arthurus

Look, I do not know what is going on, but if NSA has a microscope so far up ALL of our kiesters, how is it that the same guys missed the Tsarneav boys why Russia tipped us off to them and they were pretty much working in the open?

Something does not add up.


59 posted on 08/01/2013 6:09:43 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: mylife

That’s an excellent question, and add to it the FZort Hood murderer. But the answer is easy: (1) political correctness, (2) forest and the trees - NSA has been looking at the former, in love with its clever algorithms and humongous ranges of surveillance, while missing the latter, because of #(1).


62 posted on 08/01/2013 6:13:50 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: mylife

Information overload. The computers spit out only the names and info that match preset criteria. There are not enough human agents to then vet those names and info. However, if an op enters a name or SS# or what have you then he gets all the info for that entry and sends the drones or just checks your cell phone to find out where you are right or looks at the set-top-box camera/mic data to see what you were doing last night in front of the TV in your bedroom.


68 posted on 08/01/2013 6:24:58 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: mylife
Look, I do not know what is going on, but if NSA has a microscope so far up ALL of our kiesters, how is it that the same guys missed the Tsarneav boys why Russia tipped us off to them and they were pretty much working in the open?

Something does not add up.

You're right; it does not add up… and here's why:
The surveillance is not about terrorists, though that's what's used to justify it, but about getting information on the people.

Or, to put it another way: it depends on what your definition of terrorist is.
This administration has made it clear that it considers Constitutionalists, people who oppose abortion, returning veterans as [potential] terrorists.
It's also likely they consider anyone with leadership skills, enough to rally the people challenge them, to be a Supreme Master Terrorist.

It is about control, of you and everyone else. That is why it does not add up.

69 posted on 08/01/2013 6:25:34 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: mylife

The Boston bombing was also used to continue the “spontaneous’ lie.

First they made the claim the 2 terrorist had an attack planned for July 4th then just a couple of days before the Boston attack changed their plans and without any advanced planning carried out the attack in Boston then “spontaneously” planned an attack for NYC.

You’re damn right it doesn’t add up unless you suspend all disbelief.

People are being misled big time.


73 posted on 08/01/2013 6:30:17 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson