The 14th amendment to the constitution contests this.
Not if you are an originalist, which is the only way I can see to read much of anything with honesty. I’m not one for penumbric emanations and the like. I don’t bend the plain meaning and original intent of words to mean what I want them to mean. That’s the dishonest game of the left. If we abandon the truth, then we become them. It’s tempting, but no. Besides, we can’t even get the SC to say that an unlisted, imaginary right doesn’t exist, so your creative formulation of the 14th has no chance in Realville.