Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vince Ferrer; 17th Miss Regt; OL Hickory
It's late, I'm tired, I'm not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV, but I'm always ready to make a total ass out of myself on things I don't know anything about. So here goes my conversational non legal non expert guess.

The police did not arrest Zimmerman because after they investigated this, THOROUGHLY, they decided that they lacked probable cause.

The police were overruled by a political racist pandering political system and Zimmerman was forced to go to trial anyway.

Perhaps Zimmerman's attorneys want to get a LEGAL RULING showing that there was NO PROBABLE CAUSE to arrest Zimmerman. The lawyers would naturally want to take this case out of the trial jurisdiction because they believe the legal personnel showed obvious bias against Zimmerman.

If they can get a legal ruling showing that there was no probable cause to arrest him, then that may remove a major impediment to filing lawsuits against the people who forced this to trial, in other words, denying them "qualified immunity," because a reasonable person with the same qualifications and experience would not have done this to Zimmerman. Just a guess, but it could be very very bad news personally for those who prosecuted him if it is ruled that there was no probable cause for arrest.

22 posted on 08/10/2013 11:27:28 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise

Nice guess, but probably not.

Zimmerman’s lawyers filed all documents on his web site. There is nothing there. So unlikely from his side.


26 posted on 08/10/2013 11:30:52 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson