Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne
My view is that if you can do it without putting public safety at risk, it's better to avoid putting non-violent early offenders into a prison environment that supports recruitment by Islamists, militants, and hardened criminals. At least they will have some shot at leading a normal productive life. Irrespective of Holder's motivations, whatever they are.
2 posted on 08/12/2013 8:36:31 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pieceofthepuzzle

Regardless of your views on the drug issue this is another example of the Obama Administration thumbing their nose at the law.

Instead of changing the law they just disregard it.


3 posted on 08/12/2013 8:38:14 AM PDT by GatorGirl (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Doesn’t this require some sort of process concerning the passing of laws, which would mean it is not a function of the executive branch. Just thinking constitutionally


4 posted on 08/12/2013 8:38:33 AM PDT by lynn4303
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Burglars are “non-violent.” So are many drug dealers, embezzlers, and other big-ticket thieves.

Mere violence does not a serious crime make.

Lessen or soften the sentence for these crimes, and we’ll get more of them.


7 posted on 08/12/2013 8:42:13 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Holder n zero like drugs and kiddi porn and all manners of addictions and tyrannies, makes sense.


11 posted on 08/12/2013 8:50:59 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson