Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enterprise

>>>>I don’t see where there were “sting” operations involved here. As I see it, the police would see a thug looking individual walking down the street. However, other than he looks like a thug, he isn’t drunk or on drugs, he isn’t on a be on the lookout list or suspected of committing a crime, and isn’t causing any problems. But the police stop him, frisk him, and find contraband. It all goes back to probable cause. I suspected that eventually, a judge would call the NYPD on it. Am I wrong here?>>>

That’s why I never get picked for jury duty. In the case above I don’t care what the perp was caring because I’d say Not Guilty due to no probable cause, and if I could I’d order the state to pay the defense expenses.


17 posted on 08/13/2013 1:23:17 AM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Undecided 2012
“Is Today the Beginning of the End of America’s ‘Tough on Crime’ Policies?”............

No, that happened the day Holder got appointed or perhaps earlier when odumbo got elected.

18 posted on 08/13/2013 4:56:43 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson